Integrating Quality Into Medical School Curriculum: One Student’s Perspective
By Anne Press
The traditional medical school curriculum has a heavy scientific focus, especially in the first two years. In an already jam-packed curriculum, it can be difficult to replace any of the materials with improvement science. To combat this, Hofstra-North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine launched—with the school’s inaugural class in 2011—a four-year curriculum in patient safety, quality, and effectiveness. The following is an example of the impact this curriculum had on me, a student in that first class.
As I sat through a lecture on biochemical pathways and the pathology that can cause diseases like cystic fibrosis (CF), I was enthralled by the mechanisms of the human body. However, the human element of the disease was missing from the lecture. I was unable to take what I was learning and apply it to actual patients, in real-life settings, and understand how it affected their care.
Process Improvements in the ED increase sepsis bundle compliance, reduce mortality
By improving compliance with the sepsis three-hour bundle, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center reduced patient mortality by 50% in just 90 days Effectively treating any infection requires a certain measure of early identification and rapid response. Infections, by their nature, worsen over time, so hospitals with successful care processes that rapidly identify and treat infections often see … Continued
The Emory Experience: Quality Improvement Skills Labs in Interdisciplinary Education
By Ariadne K. DeSimone In spring 2014, one day after taking my Step 2 Clinical Knowledge of the United States Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE), I finally had time to turn my attention to thoughts about my future and to the email messages that had accumulated over the past month. One announcement stood out: The Emory … Continued
Patient and Family Advisory Councils
Patient and family advisory councils (PFAC) are groups of patients, family members, community members, and hospital staff who work together to bring the unique perspectives of patients and families to a hospital’s operations, especially its efforts to improve care. According to one estimate, more than 2,000 hospitals in the United States have PFACs. They are also slowly becoming more common in outpatient settings.
Safety Concerns Persist for Low-Dose Methotrexate
For patients with severe, disabling rheumatoid arthritis (RA), oral methotrexate is often the preferred disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, unless it is specifically contraindicated (Bykerk et al., 2012; Saag et al., 2008; Singh et al., 2012). compared to dosing for antineoplastic indications, methotrexate for RA is administered once weekly as low-dose therapy (Sing et al., 2012). According to official prescribing information, the recommended starting dose is a single oral dose of 7.5 mg once weekly or divided oral doses of 2.5 mg every 12 hours for three doses per week. The dosing schedule may be adjusted to achieve optimal response, with doses up to about 25 mg weekly.
Zero Harm is the Goal
Ask 10 healthcare leaders if they’ve heard of high reliability, and it’s almost certain all 10 will say they have. Ask those same 10 to define high reliability, and things get interesting.
Many healthcare leaders have a genuine interest in high reliability but often do not know exactly what it means or how to incorporate it among their organization’s other priorities. They just know it sounds right to say their organization is working to “get to high reliability,” and they hope it will be the silver bullet that solves all problems. Unfortunately, the term “high reliability” can become a buzzword when used without understanding what it is. Employed this way, it may sound great but lack substance—all sizzle and no steak.
Labor and Management Working Together to Improve Patient Satisfaction
As I approached the end of my first postgraduate year (PGY1), one of the chief residents asked me to participate on the “LMP PCC project.” He explained that LMP PCC referred to a multidisciplinary labor-management, patient-centered care project where representatives from different disciplines would work together to enhance patient experience. At the beginning, I wasn’t sure what that actually meant, but I was excited for the opportunity to work on something that promised to make a difference, especially in my patients’ lives. As a PGY-1 resident, my days were usually occupied with floor work, didactic activities, and clinic schedules, so I looked forward to working on my first quality improvement project.
Delivering Confidence
During the transition from hospital to home–or a skilled nursing or long-term care facility–patients with complex medical needs are at risk for sub-optimal outcomes due to issues with medication adherence and errors. Of particular concern are patients who, once discharged, do not obtain the medications prescribed for them during their hospital stay.
In Context: Extracting Relevance from Unstructured Medical Data
Recently I sat patiently in an examination room while my physician typed notes into a computer terminal. After a few moments, he paused and asked, “You know what electronic medical records are good at?” I smiled politely. “Federal compliance and billing,” he said. I didn’t have to wait long for the follow-up I knew was coming. “You know what they’re bad at? Caring for patients.”
Beyond the Front Lines
Earlier this year, the National Patient Safety Foundation’s Lucian Leape Institute released a report calling for greater transparency in healthcare as a means of improving patient safety. Defining transparency as “the free, uninhibited flow of information available to the scrutiny of others,” the report argues for transparency across all areas of healthcare: between clinicians and patients; among clinicians; between organizations; and with the public (NPSF Lucian Leape Institute, 2015).